Red Team

Imagine a network designed to withstand attackers, not assumptions. Our pen testing operators assess networks the way adversaries navigate them, uncovering paths to privilege, lateral movement, and impact. By continuously validating segmentation, access, and detection controls, we help organizations move from perimeter defense to resilient infrastructure.

Red Team Overview

Ongoing, campaign-style adversary simulations that exercise detection, response, and business impact — proving security posture improvement over time.

Assumed Breach

Simulate post-breach scenarios to test detection, response, and resilience against advanced adversary behavior.

Methodology:

  • Assume initial access and execute scenario-based attack paths
  • Test lateral movement, persistence, and data exfiltration techniques
  • Evaluate security monitoring, alerting, and response effectiveness
  • Measure time-to-detection and containment gaps
  • Deliver executive-ready findings with operational improvement guidance

Physical On-Site Assessment

Evaluate physical security controls onsite to identify access weaknesses and real-world intrusion risks.

Methodology:

  • Review facility perimeter controls, entry points, and access mechanisms
  • Test badge systems, visitor management, and security procedures
  • Assess tailgating, social engineering, and onsite access controls
  • Evaluate camera coverage, alarms, and monitoring effectiveness
  • Deliver prioritized findings with practical remediation recommendations

Phishing & Vishing

Continuously test employee susceptibility to phishing (text / email) and vishing (voice) attacks to reduce human-driven security risk.

Methodology:

  • Design realistic phishing and vishing attack scenarios
  • Target users based on role, access level, and risk profile
  • Execute controlled email and voice-based social engineering campaigns
  • Measure click rates, credential exposure, and reporting behavior
  • Deliver actionable insights and remediation to strengthen security awareness

Assumed Breach

Simulate post-breach scenarios to test detection, response, and resilience against advanced adversary behavior.

Methodology:

  • Assume initial access and execute scenario-based attack paths
  • Test lateral movement, persistence, and data exfiltration techniques
  • Evaluate security monitoring, alerting, and response effectiveness
  • Measure time-to-detection and containment gaps
  • Deliver executive-ready findings with operational improvement guidance

Physical On-Site Assessment

Evaluate physical security controls onsite to identify access weaknesses and real-world intrusion risks.

Methodology:

  • Review facility perimeter controls, entry points, and access mechanisms
  • Test badge systems, visitor management, and security procedures
  • Assess tailgating, social engineering, and onsite access controls
  • Evaluate camera coverage, alarms, and monitoring effectiveness
  • Deliver prioritized findings with practical remediation recommendations

Phishing & Vishing

Continuously test employee susceptibility to phishing (text / email) and vishing (voice) attacks to reduce human-driven security risk.

Methodology:

  • Design realistic phishing and vishing attack scenarios
  • Target users based on role, access level, and risk profile
  • Execute controlled email and voice-based social engineering campaigns
  • Measure click rates, credential exposure, and reporting behavior
  • Deliver actionable insights and remediation to strengthen security awareness

Assumed Breach

Simulate post-breach scenarios to test detection, response, and resilience against advanced adversary behavior.

Methodology:

  • Assume initial access and execute scenario-based attack paths
  • Test lateral movement, persistence, and data exfiltration techniques
  • Evaluate security monitoring, alerting, and response effectiveness
  • Measure time-to-detection and containment gaps
  • Deliver executive-ready findings with operational improvement guidance

Physical On-Site Assessment

Evaluate physical security controls onsite to identify access weaknesses and real-world intrusion risks.

Methodology:

  • Review facility perimeter controls, entry points, and access mechanisms
  • Test badge systems, visitor management, and security procedures
  • Assess tailgating, social engineering, and onsite access controls
  • Evaluate camera coverage, alarms, and monitoring effectiveness
  • Deliver prioritized findings with practical remediation recommendations

Phishing & Vishing

Continuously test employee susceptibility to phishing (text / email) and vishing (voice) attacks to reduce human-driven security risk.

Methodology:

  • Design realistic phishing and vishing attack scenarios
  • Target users based on role, access level, and risk profile
  • Execute controlled email and voice-based social engineering campaigns
  • Measure click rates, credential exposure, and reporting behavior
  • Deliver actionable insights and remediation to strengthen security awareness

Powered By Our Darwin Attack Platform

WHAT TO EXPECT?

Onboarding Platform

1

Align Objectives & Outcomes

2

Ongoing Testing / PIT Testing

3

Quarterly Service Review

4

Ongoing Testing Dashboard

5

Why Evolve Security?

01

CTEM Maturity Model

Evaluate CTEM maturity and strengthen resilience by assessing readiness against evolving adversary techniques and attack vectors.

02

CPT Market Leader

Offensive SOC and engineering experts drive measurable outcomes, guiding every phase from exposure discovery to remediation.

03

Award Winning Platform

Darwin Attack platform validates security controls and precisely pinpoints prioritized vulnerabilities across dynamic environments.

04

OffSec Operations Center (OSOC)

Agile bullpen of offensive testers rapidly adapts tactics, mirroring adversaries as threats and business priorities shift.

05

Trusted Methodologies

Industry-trusted methodologies including OWASP, OSSTMM, PTES, and NIST ensure disciplined, comprehensive penetration testing rigor.

06

Customized Simulations

Tailored simulations reflect an industry’s distinct threats, adversary behaviors, and mission-critical attack scenarios.

Game Changing Resources

Dive into our game changing resource library that delivers novel thought leadership and real-time perspectives that reimagine how organizations design, manage and elevate offensive security programs

Claude Mythos CISO AI Security Guide

Claude Mythos finds zero days overnight with a 73% success rate. See what this AI shift means for your security program and why continuous pen testing is now non negotiable.

ROI on Continuous Penetration Testing (CPT)

ROI on Continuous Penetration Testing (CPT): Annual Penetration Testing Is Failing Modern Security Programs

Webinar: A Case for CTEM

A Case for CTEM | September 2025 | Paul Petefish, Jason Rowland, & Victor Marchetto

Fireside Chat: State of Cybersecurity 2025

State of Cybersecurity 2025 | December 2024 | Nils Puhlman & Mark Carney

St Louis G2 Conference

St Louis

Zafran & Evolve Security - Executive Roundtable

Pen Testing in the Age of AI: Man + Machine w/ Paul Petefish

AI is changing security fast. But is it replacing pentesters, or just giving them a powerful new co-pilot?

Scaling to $100M from CISO to CEO to Investor

Most technical experts hit a ceiling at the C-suite, but very few understand the blueprint to transcend from protector to builder and investor.