Red Team
Imagine a network designed to withstand attackers, not assumptions. Our pen testing operators assess networks the way adversaries navigate them, uncovering paths to privilege, lateral movement, and impact. By continuously validating segmentation, access, and detection controls, we help organizations move from perimeter defense to resilient infrastructure.
Red Team Overview
Ongoing, campaign-style adversary simulations that exercise detection, response, and business impact — proving security posture improvement over time.
Assumed Breach
Simulate post-breach scenarios to test detection, response, and resilience against advanced adversary behavior.
Methodology:
- Assume initial access and execute scenario-based attack paths
- Test lateral movement, persistence, and data exfiltration techniques
- Evaluate security monitoring, alerting, and response effectiveness
- Measure time-to-detection and containment gaps
- Deliver executive-ready findings with operational improvement guidance
Physical On-Site Assessment
Evaluate physical security controls onsite to identify access weaknesses and real-world intrusion risks.
Methodology:
- Review facility perimeter controls, entry points, and access mechanisms
- Test badge systems, visitor management, and security procedures
- Assess tailgating, social engineering, and onsite access controls
- Evaluate camera coverage, alarms, and monitoring effectiveness
- Deliver prioritized findings with practical remediation recommendations
Phishing & Vishing
Continuously test employee susceptibility to phishing (text / email) and vishing (voice) attacks to reduce human-driven security risk.
Methodology:
- Design realistic phishing and vishing attack scenarios
- Target users based on role, access level, and risk profile
- Execute controlled email and voice-based social engineering campaigns
- Measure click rates, credential exposure, and reporting behavior
- Deliver actionable insights and remediation to strengthen security awareness
Assumed Breach
Simulate post-breach scenarios to test detection, response, and resilience against advanced adversary behavior.
Methodology:
- Assume initial access and execute scenario-based attack paths
- Test lateral movement, persistence, and data exfiltration techniques
- Evaluate security monitoring, alerting, and response effectiveness
- Measure time-to-detection and containment gaps
- Deliver executive-ready findings with operational improvement guidance
Physical On-Site Assessment
Evaluate physical security controls onsite to identify access weaknesses and real-world intrusion risks.
Methodology:
- Review facility perimeter controls, entry points, and access mechanisms
- Test badge systems, visitor management, and security procedures
- Assess tailgating, social engineering, and onsite access controls
- Evaluate camera coverage, alarms, and monitoring effectiveness
- Deliver prioritized findings with practical remediation recommendations
Phishing & Vishing
Continuously test employee susceptibility to phishing (text / email) and vishing (voice) attacks to reduce human-driven security risk.
Methodology:
- Design realistic phishing and vishing attack scenarios
- Target users based on role, access level, and risk profile
- Execute controlled email and voice-based social engineering campaigns
- Measure click rates, credential exposure, and reporting behavior
- Deliver actionable insights and remediation to strengthen security awareness
WHAT TO EXPECT?
Onboarding Platform
1
Align Objectives & Outcomes
2
Ongoing Testing / PIT Testing
3
Quarterly Service Review
4
Ongoing Testing Dashboard
5
Why Evolve Security?
01
CTEM Maturity Model
Evaluate CTEM maturity and strengthen resilience by assessing readiness against evolving adversary techniques and attack vectors.
02
CPT Market Leader
Offensive SOC and engineering experts drive measurable outcomes, guiding every phase from exposure discovery to remediation.
03
Award Winning Platform
Darwin Attack platform validates security controls and precisely pinpoints prioritized vulnerabilities across dynamic environments.
04
OffSec Operations Center (OSOC)
Agile bullpen of offensive testers rapidly adapts tactics, mirroring adversaries as threats and business priorities shift.
05
Trusted Methodologies
Industry-trusted methodologies including OWASP, OSSTMM, PTES, and NIST ensure disciplined, comprehensive penetration testing rigor.
06
Customized Simulations
Tailored simulations reflect an industry’s distinct threats, adversary behaviors, and mission-critical attack scenarios.
Game Changing Resources
Dive into our game changing resource library that delivers novel thought leadership and real-time perspectives that reimagine how organizations design, manage and elevate offensive security programs
ROI on Continuous Penetration Testing (CPT)
ROI on Continuous Penetration Testing (CPT): Annual Penetration Testing Is Failing Modern Security Programs
The CTEM Chronicles: A Fictional Case Study of Real-World Adoption
Explore a fictional case study of Lunera Capital, a mid-sized financial firm that adopted Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). See how theory meets practice and how this company goes from chaos to clarity in cybersecurity.
Webinar: A Case for CTEM
A Case for CTEM | September 2025 | Paul Petefish, Jason Rowland, & Victor Marchetto
Fireside Chat: State of Cybersecurity 2025
State of Cybersecurity 2025 | December 2024 | Nils Puhlman & Mark Carney
Zafran & Evolve Security - Executive Roundtable
Black Hat & Def Con
Las Vegas
